mbassador Liu Xiaoming said the UK’s proposal of a way to citizenship for up to 3,000,000 Hong Kongers added up to “net impedance .petgiftideas”.
The offer came subsequent to Beijing acquired the dubious and clearing new law.
Rivals state it dissolves the domain’s opportunities as a semi-independent district.
Extremist Joshua Wong had before called for more help, asking his individual Hong Kongers and the more extensive world not to “kowtow” to Beijing.
Why individuals are terrified of Hong Kong’s new law
Minutes after new law, voices quit
Joshua Wong, the banner kid the for Hong Kong fights
Be that as it may, Ambassador Liu said he trusted the UK would reexamine its offer.
“The UK government continues offering unreliable comments on Hong Kong undertakings,” he told a virtual news meeting.
The diplomat said a choice on precisely how Beijing planned to react to the citizenship offer would be made once it knew the subtleties.
Mr Liu likewise cautioned the UK that on the off chance that it ruled against utilizing Chinese tech goliath Huawei’s innovation to fabricate its 5G arrange, this would send a “negative message to other Chinese organizations”.
UK government weighs up Huawei boycott
‘Constrained admission’ abused UK broadcasting rules
Why Huawei’s days in the UK could be numbered
The UK has contended that China has reneged on an understanding that produced results in 1997, which offered certain opportunities to Hong Kong for a long time as a byproduct of giving the region back to Beijing.
Later on Monday, a representative for UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson encouraged China not to meddle if Hong Kongers with British National (Overseas) status looked to go to the UK.
“We would anticipate that China should comprehend the significance of clinging to global law,” the representative said.
Media captionHong Kongers with British international IDs are separated about whether to leave the nation
He included: “We are as of now surveying the national security law and its lawful implications as far as removal with Hong Kong.
“There are as of now broad removal shields in the UK. The courts are required to bar an individual’s removal to any nation on the off chance that it would be contrary with their human rights or if the solicitation gives off an impression of being propelled by their political conclusion.”
Additionally on Monday, Facebook and its informing administration WhatsApp said they had “delayed” preparing demands for data from the Hong Kong government and law requirement offices “pending further evaluation of the effect of the national security law”.
The appraisal will incorporate “formal human rights due ingenuity and counsels with human rights specialists”, as per an announcement.
‘Scarcely hidden admonition’
By Paul Adams, BBC strategic journalist
Represetative Liu is nothing not exactly hearty. His judgments of what Beijing sees as British obstruction in China’s interior issues are natural.
In any case, with Britain and China now at loggerheads over in any event two significant issues – Hong Kong and Huawei – the feeling of a fraying relationship is more grounded than at any other time.
All endeavors to impede the desire of 1.4 billion Chinese individuals, Mr Liu cautioned, were destined to disappointment. At the point when the standards of sovereign equity and non-obstruction were abused, he stated, at that point connections would unavoidably endure “difficulties, even retrogression”.
Also, with regards to Huawei, Boris Johnson’s proposal a week ago that China may now be viewed as an “antagonistic state seller” is obviously taken as a genuine insult. Chinese authorities, the minister stated, had never depicted Britain along these lines.
The diplomat didn’t explain the outcomes of Britain changing seminar on Huawei, or of Britain’s proposal of citizenship to British National (Overseas) identification holders.
In any case, his utilization of a statement he ascribed to previous US National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski – “On the off chance that we make China an adversary, China will turn into a foe” – was a scarcely hidden admonition.
Various different nations, including the US, Canada, Japan and Australia, have additionally communicated worry over the burden of the law.